Tuning the structure of microcellular-injected polypropylene

11 September 2015
Jose Antonio Reglero Ruiz, Jean-François Agassant, Michel Vincent, Aurore Claverie, and Sébastien Huck
A new microcellular injection process that uses gas counter pressure and movement of the core-back mold results in low-density polypropylene parts with well-controlled cellular structures.

Commercial and industrial interest in polymeric structural foams is increasing owing to the good mechanical properties and weight reduction that they provide.1 The injection foaming process, which produces core-shell structures with closed outer skins and a foam core, provides several advantages that are particularly useful for the fabrication of injection-molded parts (for example, good dimensional stability and a reduced fabrication time).2, 3 By adjusting the cooling process (for example, the mold temperature), the thickness of the solid outer skins can be controlled.4 However, the resulting products usually suffer from severe surface defects and nonhomogeneous cellular morphologies.5, 6

Microcellular injection molding can be carried out by adding chemical blowing agents (CBAs)7 in the form of pellets directly to the hopper, which lead to foaming behavior. The use of the core-back technique, in which the core side of the mold is drawn back as the foaming stage occurs, has advanced the field because it can control the foaming expansion ratio. Additionally, a gas counter pressure (GCP) inside the mold cavity can be used during filling to prevent premature foaming and, therefore, improve the surface quality of injected parts.8, 9 However, information is scant regarding the combined effect of different polymer formulations, the CBA type, injection parameters, and GCP values on the surface aspect and cellular morphology of the injected samples.

To define the most efficient way of producing homogeneous foaming structures with a good surface quality, we carried out a deep morphological analysis of foamed injected samples. We fabricated samples using different polypropylene formulations, CBAs, and injection parameters. We then quantified the foamed-part morphology and investigated the surface of the samples using image analysis.

We used three different types of polypropylene for sample fabrication: pure polypropylene (PP-1), polypropylene filled with 7% by weight talc (PP-2), and polypropylene filled with 12% by weight mineral charges (7% talc and 5% magnesium fibers, PP-3). We also used two different endothermic CBAs. These foaming agents are polyethylene-based compounds mixed with 70% by weight citric acid (CBA-1) and 70% by weight sodium bicarbonate (CBA-2).

The final density of the injection-molded parts lie between 0.5 and 0.6g/cm3, depending only on the core-back opening course, which we varied between 1.2 and 1.5mm. The parts have a solid outer skin with a thickness of typically 350–400μm. Figure 1 shows the effect of the injection times (0.4 and 1.5s) on the cellular structure of PP-3+CBA-1. When the injection time is increased, the skin thickness remains almost constant. However, the cell shape becomes less spherical and the thickness increasingly variable. The influence of GCP on the cellular morphology is negligible, but the surface aspect is significantly improved when values of above 2.5MPa are used (see Figure 2).


Influence of injection time (tinj) on the morphology of polypropylene (PP) composites. These samples comprise PP filled with 7% by weight talc and 5% by weight magnesium fibers (PP-3) and a chemical blowing agent (polyethylene-based compound mixed with 70% by weight citric acid, CBA-1). Each bar=1mm.


Influence of the gas counter pressure (GCP) value on the surface aspect of an injected sample of pure polypropylene (PP-1) and CBA-1. Each bar=1mm.

The polypropylene formulation has a considerable influence on the quality of the molded parts. The pore size is homogeneous for PP-1 and PP-2, but the presence of magnesium fibers in PP-3 induces an inhomogeneous cellular structure, with larger cells in the core. Samples injected with CBA-2 exhibit a lower cell radius (40μm) than samples injected with CBA-1 (80μm). The influence of the polypropylene formulation and CBA type on the cellular structure are shown in Figure 3, and the morphological parameters obtained by image analysis are provided in Table 1.


Optical micrographs showing the influence of the PP formulation and CBA type. CBA-2: Polyethylene-based compound mixed with 70% by weight sodium bicarbonate. Each bar=1mm.

Morphological parameters of the parts fabricated with different formulations. PP-2: PP filled with 7% by weight talc.

PPCBARadius (μm)Density (g/cm3)
1174 ± 80.53
241 ± 30.55
2177 ± 90.54
238 ± 30.51
3196 ± 250.59
251 ± 110.53

We have shown that the use of CBAs combined with moderate GCP values and core-back movement results in low-density samples (0.5–0.6g/cm3) with a more homogeneous structure than those obtained using classic foaming injection processes. Additionally, the foam structure can be controlled by altering the PP formulation (fillers and fibers), the type of CBA, and the injection parameters. This technology could prove useful in automotive sectors, in which the combination of weight reduction and good mechanical properties is essential. In the next stage of our research, we intend to analyze the microcellular injection process of complex parts and to use new formulations and CBAs.


Authors

Jose Antonio Reglero Ruiz
Mines ParisTech - CEMEF

José Antonio Reglero Ruiz, a postdoctoral researcher, has specializes in cellular materials and focuses on the analysis of micro- and nano-cellular polymer materials. He has authored or co-authored more than 20 publications in international peer-reviewed journals.

Jean-François Agassant
Mines ParisTech - CEMEF

Jean-François Agassant is a professor and head of the mechanical and material engineering department. He is involved in both experimental and theoretical research into polymer-forming process analysis and has been the author or co-author of more than 100 scientific papers in refereed journals, and of reference books covering polymer-forming processes in both French and English.

Michel Vincent
Mines ParisTech - CEMEF

Michel Vincent is Directeur de Recherches (equivalent to professor) at the French Scientific Research Center. His research focuses on polymer processing, particularly injection molding and composite processing.

Aurore Claverie
MECAPLAST

Aurore Claverie leads the innovation department, where she is in charge of the development of new products and the implementation of new methodologies in plastic-injection processes.

Sébastien Huck
MECAPLAST

Sébastien Huck joined the skill center in Monaco as an injection expert after several years working in support of MECAPLAST in Serbia. He is currently in charge of technical issues for the innovation projects of the group.


References

  1. J. Xu and L.-S. (Tom) Turng, Microcellular injection molding, Wiley International, 2010.

  2. A. Mechraoui, B. Riedl and D. Rodrigue, Mechanical properties of polypropylene structural foams with fiber-reinforced skins, J. Cell. Plast. 47 (2), pp. 115-132, 2011.

  3. A. K. Bledzki and O. Faruk, Influence of processing temperature on microcellular injection-moulded wood–polypropylene composites, Macromol. Mater. Eng. 291 (10), pp. 1226-1232, 2006.

  4. E. Bociaga and P. Palutkiewicz, The influence of injection molding parameters and blowing agent addition on selected properties, surface state, and structure of HDPE parts, Polym. Eng. Sci. 53 (4), pp. 780-791, 2013.

  5. A. Ahmadzai, A. H. Behravesh, M. T. Sarabi and P. Shahi, Visualization of foaming phenomena in thermoplastic injection molding process, J. Cell. Plast. 50 (3), pp. 279-300, 2014.

  6. S. W. Cha and J. D. Yoon, The relationship of mold temperatures and swirl marks on the surface of microcellular plastics, Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 44 (5), pp. 795-803, 2005.

  7. A. K. Bledzki and O. Faruk, Effects of the chemical foaming agents, injection parameters, and melt-flow index on the microstructure and mechanical properties of microcellular injection-molded wood-fiber/polypropylene composites, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 97 (3), pp. 1090-1096, 2005.

  8. A. K. Bledzki, J. Kuhn, H. Kirschling and W. Pitscheneder, Microcellular injection molding of PP and PC/ABS with precision mold opening and gas counterpressure, Cell. Polym. 27 (2), pp. 90-100, 2008.

  9. S.-C. Chen, P. S. Minh and J.-A. Chang, Gas-assisted mold temperature control for improving the quality of injection molded parts with fiber additives, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer 38 (3), pp. 304-312, 2011.

DOI:  10.2417/spepro.006075



Footer Links (2nd Row)